10.4056 - Motion
Switzerland must leave the IMF and World Bank
Posted by
Filing Date
16.12.2010
Filed National Council of State
deliberations
Not yet addressed the board
Text deposited
Switzerland out of the IMF and the World Bank, in parallel the Federal Council should investigate the true costs of our involvement.
The Federal Council is responsible for operationalizing these two applications before the end of this Parliament, therefore the federal elections of 13 October 2011, and to institute all necessary civil and criminal proceedings in favor of Sovereign.
Development
1. The IMF and World Bank violate Swiss neutrality by forcing us to political action directed "by the United States." Thus, since we entered "our economic policy" has become "colonial" and anti-development, particularly in the poorest countries and now those neighbors of the EU.
2. Moreover, they are expensive and are always based on dubious statistics, after such forced Switzerland to sell its gold during the lowest and change our Constitution for this purpose.
3. The IMF and World Bank are also the game - economically unhealthy - the artificial maintenance of the Euro and diktats "unconstitutional" by the ECB.
4. By their draconian adjustment policies (sic) of unemployment, the IMF and World Bank often exacerbate the problems by causing devastating social consequences and increased poverty.
5. They also want to maintain and preserve the privileges of an inefficient and wasteful (creation of false currency "from scratch", as evidenced notably the Nobel Maurice Allais, by trillions, with a fractional banking system, liar , wasteful, cheat and thief also from wages, bonuses and bonuses antisocial).
6. The IMF and World Bank are - in their own statements - a tax, currency and a single world government, very dangerous to our liberties. They are neither subsidiary nor federalist.
7. Moreover, they are not at all democratic, nor transparent, and contribute to corruption and fraud, both by allocating salaries and costs are too high number of employees exaggerated. Nepotism is rampant.
8. Even the controversial Keynesian "adviser" to Obama, Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize in economics in particular and vice-president of the World Bank from 1997 to 2000, has attacked the IMF in a book . It accuses him of putting the interests of its main shareholder the United States, ahead of troubled country.
Response of the Federal Council of 16.02.2011
OUR COMMENTS IN CAPITALS.
The Swiss membership of the IMF and the World Bank was accepted
FITNESS
by the Swiss people in 1992. Since then, the key objectives and key mandates of the IMF (preserving the stability of the international financial system) and the World Bank (promotion of economic and social development and fight against poverty) have not changed. Moreover, the vulnerability of the economy has grown steadily over the course of globalization.
BECAUSE OF THIS GLOBALIZATION accentuating PLANS OF THE ESSENCE WITH THE CONSEQUENCES IN LIBYA, EGYPT, TUNISIA, riots ETC ...
The role of the IMF and the World Bank has therefore won importance.
THEIR REAL GOAL IS TO PROTECT THE BANKING SYSTEM WITH ITS CURRENT BONUS INDECENT AND EXTEND THE DEBT ON THE TAXPAYERS
Switzerland, with its economy based on trade with the rest of the world's financial center is internationally recognized and its own currency, must in its best interest to be strongly represented in these institutions.
WE HAVE VERY WELL LIVED OUT OF THEM. REAL NEUTRALITY CAN NOT MAKE OUT WHAT THESE MONSTERS COLD AND COMPUTERS THAT CAUSE OF WARS AND REVOLUTIONS FOR HUNGER IN RUNNING THEIR OWN TAXPAYERS bloodless. THIS SYSTEM COULD EXPLODE AT ANY MOMENT IN A CRISIS WORSE THAN THE PREVIOUS AND SWITZERLAND TO LEAVE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR THIS Pétaudière.
For these reasons, the Federal Council does not agree with the author of the motion.
Regarding the points raised, the Federal Council took the following position:
1. The duties that the statutes require the IMF to members of the institution - primarily to avoid discriminatory currency practices and to undergo regular examinations of countries - does not affect the neutrality of Switzerland.
FALSE CAUSE HARDSHIP POLICIES social unrest that leads to wars. WAVES OF REFUGEES ARRIVE FOR Escape ALWAYS THE WORST CONDITIONS.
2. The report on foreign economic policy provides regular information on the cost of participation of Switzerland in the IMF and World Bank. In addition, the current financial commitment vis-à-vis the IMF is specified on the website of the Swiss National Bank.
IT IS NOT EASY TO CONSOLIDATE ALL THESE NUMBERS AND WE WOULD LIKE THE GOVERNMENT WE PRESENT THEIR CONSOLIDATED FIGURES.
ESPECIALLY SINCE SOME OF THESE NUMBERS MAY BE DOUBLED ON DEMAND OF IMF or World Bank
Switzerland is today willing to put a maximum of 10.6 billion Swiss francs available to the IMF. At the end of October 2010, only 1.7 billion had actually been requested. These financial contributions, that are provided to the IMF and not to individual countries concerned are remunerated at market rates. In the past, the IMF has always fulfilled its reporting obligations to its members.
EXAMPLE, THE ABOVE FIGURES ARE UNDER-ESTIMATED. WE KNOW THEY ARE ALREADY RISING. SPOKEN OF 16 BILLION OR MORE THAN FOUR TIMES PER CAPITA THAN OTHER CONTRIBUTORS EUROPEAN AND SIX TIMES MORE THAN THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS.
The Federal Council shall specify the reasons for the sale of gold by the SNB in the report he submitted in response to postulate Stamm 07.3708. It should be noted that the gold parity of the franc was abandoned in the wake of the revision of the Federal Constitution in 2000. There is no relationship in this regard with the membership of the IMF and World Bank.
TOWNSHIPS HAVE LEFT THEIR RIGHT TO FIGHT MONEY AND USE OF THE MONETARY CREATIONS NIL (scratch) BY BANKS to BNS. GAINS LOST SOVEREIGNTY OF MONEY WERE PARTIALLY OFFSET BY CANTONALE THE STANDARD DISTRIBUTIONS TO TOWNSHIPS (2.5 BILLION). THE BNS WANTS MORE TO HONOR THOSE COMMITMENTS AND WANTS TO COVER THE RISK OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. THEY WANT privatizing gains and socializing losses, WHICH IS EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF THE COMMON GOOD.
3. The granting of loans to countries in the eurozone is perfectly compatible with the IMF's mandate, which includes among its task to provide members with knowledge of serious balance of payments of credits temporary measures to promote macroeconomic adjustments. These loans carry an economically rigorous agreed between the beneficiary country and the IMF. Credits are granted to countries regardless of whether they practice an exchange rate fixed or floating, and the fact that they are members or not of a monetary union.
THE BRETTON WOODS (IMF / WB) SHOULD HELP THE POOR COUNTRIES. OR, THEY HELP THE RICH COUNTRIES AND POOR COUNTRIES RICH TO EXPLOIT THE POOR COUNTRIES RICH AND POOR COUNTRIES. PLANS ARE STRICTLY ABSURD AND WE ARE GOING TO DISASTER IN DISASTER THAT SEEM EVEN INTENDED BY SOME, SEEKING THE BEST FOR CHAOS DOMINATE THE WEAKEST.
WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY, THE CAPITAL, THE ENGINEERS, THE MARKET BUT WORSE GLOBALIZATION AND ENJOY THE CRISES IN PARTICULAR arms dealer. LITTLE SWITZERLAND NOT BE MORE EFFECTIVE FOR THOSE BIG MACHINE wasting TIME AND CAPITAL PROJECTS IN Elephantine and whimsical
4. Credit programs agreed by the IMF and World Bank member countries with the aim of implementing sustainable policies in monetary, fiscal, financial and structural. The IMF can not allocate credits if the debt situation can be stabilized in the medium term. In situations of exceptional crisis, adjustments are needed in terms of economic policy. Especially in programs that benefit developing countries or emerging countries, the IMF also monitors set up social safety nets. He takes care that expenditure for the poorest sections of the population are excluded from adjustment measures.
STIGLITZ SHOWS IN THE JOURNAL OF THE DIPLOMATIC WORLD THAT ALL THIS IS WRONG AND THAT THE IMF AGGRAVATED PROBLEMS.
http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2002/04/STIGLITZ/16370
5. The IMF is responsible for preserving and promoting international financial stability, while the core mandate of the World Bank is to promote economic and social development and fight against poverty. As has been stated above, the programs agreed by the IMF and World Bank with the recipient countries are implementing economic policies and sustainable development of institutions necessary for that purpose. This promote an orderly adjustment. If necessary, we will consider such a restructuring and refinancing of the banking sector. Resources are generally allocated to the central bank and their use is subject to strict supervision.
WE KNOW ITS strict surveillance ... BY EXAMPLE IN EGYPT AND TUNISIA (70 BILLION Mubarak) ...
THIS 1ST LINK IS A REPORT ON TUNISIAN ARABIC, BUT HE CAN SPEAK ITSELF, SO SEE IT!
THIS 2ND LINK SEEN THE EVENTS WHICH HAVE PLACE IS GOING TO COMMENT, WE ARE IN TUNISIA , NOT EVEN 2 MONTHS BEFORE THE ONLY ESCAPE THE THIEF NUMBER 1, BEN ALI, LARGE FRIEND OF THE FRENCH AND WESTERN DEMOCRATS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEA9X6j7b_U&feature=player_embedded
6. The IMF has its own currency reserves, special drawing rights, whose value is composed a basket of currencies (USD, EUR, JPY and GBP). The quotas of IMF members now total some 300 billion U.S. dollars. Compared to official foreign exchange reserves held in the world, special drawing rights represent only a share of less than 4 per cent and therefore play a negligible role.
THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND REPORT PUBLISHED IN FEBRUARY 2011 A POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT OF THE DOLLAR AS CURRENCY RESERVE WORLD BY SDR. THIS WILL NOT BE SIGNIFICANT ...
The IMF and World Bank to lend assistance many countries in the implementation of processes and institutions to ensure sustainability of federal structures. Neither the IMF nor the World Bank do, however, ways that allow them to levy taxes of their own.
BUT NOT YET DSK WANTS IN THE NEAR FUTURE.
7. The IMF and World Bank are transparent institutions that, in principle, published their analysis of countries, their documentation and program documents. All formal decisions are taken by the Board. The shares of votes of member countries are determined by a formula that is based on economic criteria. The distribution of votes shall be reviewed periodically.
SEE ITEM 4
Regarding the collaboration of the IMF and World Bank with their members, special emphasis is placed on encouraging good governance and the fight against corruption. Furthermore, a series of measures guaranteeing the integrity of the institutions themselves. Both have independent evaluation bodies, a strict code of conduct and aid in rows confidential integrity.
POINT 5, endemic corruption
8. The Federal Council knows the criticisms of Professor Stiglitz in respect of the Bretton Woods institutions. These criticisms have greatly contributed to the IMF and World Bank learn from the Asian crisis. It should be noted here that Professor Stiglitz has never questioned the existence of the IMF and World Bank.
STIGLITZ FOR THEY HAVE FAILED SERIOUSLY
The Federal Council considers it important that the IMF and World Bank remain institutions can learn. In this regard, the work of the independent evaluation bodies are particularly important because they may lead to criticism of the IMF and the World Bank and, where appropriate, on recommendations for improvements.
OR OUT BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE AND THAT THE SWITZERLAND AS Swissair went bankrupt ... DO
Statement of the Federal Council of 16.02.2011
The Federal Council proposes reject the motion.
Council priority
National Council
Co-signers (11)
How to create and share the surplus:
https: / / docs.google.com / viewer? a = v & & pid = explore = true & Chrome srcid = 1Kxlo32UKwGx0fVhNYmkul1mr0oKs6RyIIdzKOUAlcWVv6n83Z-EHs-Cnr8lc & hl = en
to circulate widely, thank you, the world is already better because of this simple gesture of solidarity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment